I’m one of those people who feels that details are essential to understanding. If you ask for the highlights, I’ll give you the book. One of the hard lessons I’ve had to learn in selling technology is that people really don’t want all of the facts. They just want answers, and quick ones – even when they aren’t exactly sure how to formulate the question. Solution providers are masters at helping them do so.
About 15 years ago, when internet banking first hit the industry, the market rendered solutions of all kinds. This was at a time when few organizations had even embraced email and few were connected to the web.
A central matter of debate was whether or not “Internet” should be spelled with a capital “I”. Everyone knew they needed to offer online banking, and that there were implied security risks, but few credit unions could effectively sift through the market rhetoric to base their purchasing decisions on what mattered most.
Many entered into expensive long-term contracts to access the internet through expensive, purportedly secure 56k frame-relay networks, when what really mattered most to them was to offer affordable online account access to their members. Credit unions like these got the answers they were looking for, but few emerged with solutions at a value toward what mattered most.
Today mobility is all the rage. Mobile banking is billed as the new member services platform, and rightly so.
Most credit unions recognize this but in their zeal to achieve mobility, they often fail to stop and consider exactly what that means. Concerned over budget, smaller credit unions often jump onto the first cheap solution that promises mobility, only to discover that they’ve purchased a mobile web site that merely wraps around their existing online banking, or a solution that links weakly to their data through indirect means.
Larger credit unions, anxious to put iPads in the hands of their member services and lending personnel, are quick to align themselves with third party developers of front-end solutions—entirely ignoring the impact of limitations that such solutions might impose.
Is your central question whether mobility should be spelled with a capital “M”? Or, are you really considering the impact of these decisions. What matters most in a member services platform is efficiency—efficient access to all services—not just a subset that might allow you to step away from the teller counter for a few moments. What the member wants on their mobile device is efficient self-service access to their entire relationship with the credit union. In providing that, the underlying architecture is a crucial consideration.
Mobility is all about member services, in the hands of your members. Make sure that your core foundation, and its mobile extension, can take your members and staff where they want to go.